Proletarian Productions videos are under selective attack by various forces who use youtube to do their dirty work. Videos have been deleted, audio tracks have been silenced, in the name of copyright or “unacceptable content.”

This is the Quackkk video, newly revised to circumvent these tactics. The audio track had been silenced by youtube due to supposed copyright violation. The audio in question, from a Hollywood movie, remains readily available through other youtube offerings which include video from that movie as well. Two other Proletarian Productions videos had their audio silenced by youtube for use of audio by a well known punk rock group – again, this same audio by the same group is still readily available through multiple other youtube offerings.

To be attacked by the enemy is a good thing for Maoism Third Worldism, to emerge victorious from such attacks is a necessity.

Quackkk concerns itself with the international united front against the First World and the fake Maoists who seek to confuse and deceive the international proletariat about the united front. These quack Maoists seek to paint members of the worldwide united front as enemies so as to disguise the real enemy, the First World. The ultimate aim of these First Worldists is to deceive the international proletariat about the road to socialist revolution and the very nature of socialism itself. Proleatrian Productions is quite happy to make minor cosmetic concessions to the First World media czars to continue promoting Maoism Third Worldism to the international proletariat as an antidote to the ideological poision of First World quacks and the Third World misleaders who echo that deadly quacking.

Remember, most Proletarian Productions are available through torrents regardless of youtube actions.

Quackkk had not been available for torrent download previously – it is now. Search mininova for the title: NewQuackkk

From Monkey Smashes Heaven:

One year anniversary of the Sunrise statement

It has been one year since the revolutionary movement declared its guiding ideology to be the fourth and latest stage of revolutionary science, Maoism-Third Worldism. In the past year there have been many victories. Our movement continues to grow on the ground in North America, Europe, and , most importantly, the Third World. Maoism-Third Worldism has shown its strength as the revolutionary ideology of the future.

We have proven ourselves  as the only true heirs of the Cultural Revolution. We’ve led the struggle against every kind of revisionism, especially the new modern revisionism. Maoism-Third Worldism is the cure to the First Worldist, revisionist poison that has destroyed the international communist movement from within. Across the board, Maoism-Third Worldism is head and shoulders above the cultisms, the dogma,  and pseudo-intellectual fluff coming from the First Worldist “Maoist” camp. We look forward to the rise of the next great wave of people’s wars, led by Maoism-Third Worldism, to destroy the First World.

Long Live Maoism-Third Worldism!

Long Live the Victory of People’s War!

(DVD torrent – search mininova for the title:

On the Occasion of the First Anniversary of Maoism Third Worldism)

From the Sunrise Statement:

4. At the core of revolutionary science today is the imposition of a joint dictatorship of the exploited nations and their allies over the exploiter populations. This requires a settling of accounts with the first world as a whole. This requires the payment of massive reparations from first world as a whole to the exploited and oppressed nations. This requires the disbanding of the U.S. and Canada (the White nation) as sovereign entities. This entails support for national liberation and self-determination for oppressed (but often not exploited) nations currently held captive within the borders of the first world, especially within the borders of U.S. and Canada. This requires return of the land.

Sutiable for framing (63×86 cm):

http://www.sendspace.com/file/lh6mf5

See:

Jose Maria Sison loves Amerikkka

Conjuring Mao against Maoism: Prachanda and Žižek

And all linked references.

Suitable for framing:

http://www.uploading.com/files/F6OGZ1IX/mtwme.png.html

It is over 30 years now since the revisionists slaughtered socialism and restored capitalism in China. We have just concluded a section of this series that exposed one of the primary ideological weapons used against the Chinese people in accomplishing the murder of socialism in the People’s Republic – the international theory of the productive forces powered by the first world labor aristocracy. We saw there that even otherwise genuine Chinese Maoists, indeed, most of China’s best Maoists, were accomplices to this despicable crime against socialism and the international proletariat. Most of China’s best Maoists were complicit in ideologically disarming the Chinese masses in the face of imperialism’s fusillade of first worldism.

It’s critical that this process of ideological disarmament be understood with absolute clarity. So let’s go over it again.

Most of the best Chinese Maoists promoted the first world labor aristocracy as oppressed and exploited, and thus as class allies of the international proletariat. But China’s educated elites, those with the influence to accomplish ideological dissemination, knew from experience and study that this class analysis of the first world was a lie. Much of the Chinese Communist Party itself had roots in these educated elites, who already knew quite well that the first world populations were, across the board, among the richest people in the world. So the lie of first worlders as exploited promulgated by the CCP constituted winking at parasite wealth by denying it.

And this denial flashed the green light for the further cancerous spread of the international theory of the productive forces amongst the Chinese masses. What could be the problem with wanting to live at the economic level of “ordinary” first worlders if those good folks were themselves “downtrodden” and “exploited”? In denying first worlder wealth, and its bloody imperialist origin, most of China’s best Maoists were with a wink and a nod giving a deadly thumbs up to imperialism’s false promise of parasitic living – the amerikkkan way of life – for the world’s exploited majority. It was a deadly thumbs up for the bullshit explanation of first worlder wealth, the international theory of the productive forces.

This constituted the ideological disarmament of the Chinese masses. The pernicious offering of the international TOPF, recall, is essentially this: forget class struggle and you can live like first worlders, like amerikkkans. There is not even an ideological hair’s breadth between that reactionary formulation and “to get rich is glorious.” Even China’s best Maoists had been marketing the first formulation among the Chinese masses for years by winking at parasite riches. Is it any wonder that the second wasn’t then a terribly hard sell?

Now, we’ve gone over this process of the international TOPF contributing to the destruction of Chinese socialism because grasping that inglorious process is of paramount importance if the worldwide struggle for socialism is to be victorious. Grasping that inglorious process is, in fact, of such paramount importance that communists have had to define an entirely new stage of Marxism, Maoism-Third Worldism, just to take account of and combat the first worldist ideology which fuels the international TOPF. You want 21st century communism, you got it: Maoism-Third Worldism.

The best Maoists in China were then the world’s most advanced communists. And without doubt worldwide there were few if any communists then doing any better on the question of the first world labor aristocracy and the international TOPF. The international proletariat knows that the Chinese Maoists were absolutely no worse on this most critical issue than the rest of the ICM, which was universally and totally fucked up when it came to first world parasitism.

But, and this brings us right to today, the international proletariat reserves the right to expect more of the advanced. Because they’re positioned to see further. The international proletariat honors the advanced with its greater expectations.

And right now the international proletariat has, 30 years on from the bitter defeat of Chinese socialism, a primary burning concern on which its expectations turn. And the high expectation in regard to that burning concern which the international proletariat currently places on today’s advanced communist forces is that those forces must be fighting with every muscle and bone to not ideologically disarm their own proletariats and oppressed nations with precisely the same fucking imperialist lie of the international theory of the productive forces as powered by the first world labor aristocracy that, uncombatted as it was, could probably have taken down socialism in China all on its own.

And that’s not all. The international proletariat places the expectation on these advanced forces that they constitute the advanced international leaders of the proletariat’s ideological offensive against this deadly imperialist lie, by far the most powerful weapon the imperialists have ever had in their ideological arsenal. The first task of the advanced always is to point out and lead the attack on the main enemy.

Today the international proletariat expects the Third World forces conducting people’s war to be those advanced detachments of communism. Of necessity ruthlessly realistic, the international proletariat expects little other than revisionism from those first worldist formations calling themselves “communist” while fronting for their own parasite constituents. Likewise the international proletariat places no expectation other than betrayal on the Third World comprador cohorts of these first wordlists such as the Prachanda clique. (1)

But the international proletariat, in honoring the advanced Third World forces conducting people’s war, expects much more from those forces. Specifically and concretely, the international proletariat today expects of these forces, for instance, better than this:

In the US and other imperialist countries, the monopoly bourgeoisie are using all kinds of maneuvers to deflect attention from the root causes of exploitation and oppression and to push down the working class, immigrants, the youth and women. They play up and generate chauvinism, racism and fascism in order to divide the working class and to pit the people in the imperialist countries against those in other countries. They use the mass media and various forms of entertainment to conjure the illusion of democracy and deflect public attention from the most important social issues.

But the working class and the rest of the people in the imperialist countries are fighting back. There have been widespread strikes by workers, protest rallies and marches by migrants and militant street actions by the youth in various imperialist countries. We can anticipate greater protest mass actions against monopoly capitalism on international and domestic issues in the months and years to come. The current crisis of world capitalism will further worsen. (2)

As we stated, today the international proletariat expects the advanced forces to be proletarian leaders of the ideological struggle against the theory of the productive forces and the first world labor aristocracy, not leaders in peddling this deadly lie to the oppressed and exploited as does the above bullshit fantasy of an exploited first world “working class” in rebellion. Such leadership demands calling out this nefarious ideology itself, and, as we’ll further clarify in Part 6b, calling out those within the advanced forces who peddle it.

(1) http://monkeysmashesheaven.wordpress.com/2006/12/21/again-on-the-%e2%80%9crim%e2%80%9d-renegades-in-nepal/

(2) http://www.josemariasison.org/jumi02/inps/speech2ilpsaus.htm

The “Hate America Campaign.” That’s what the United Snakes State Department called China’s offensive to eradicate bourgeois ideology in the ranks of the educators.(1) Would that those reactionary goons have been correct.

The Chinese Communist Party’s struggle to ideologically re-educate the educators began before liberation in the areas under CCP control. After liberation this effort became an all out nation-wide campaign.

Political classes were set up at all universities and all members of the universities – administrators, professors, students, and all staff – were required to attend. Similar political classes were initiated at primary and secondary schools. Revolutionary dramas were staged in the schools and other proletarian agitation was conducted. Criticism and self criticism sessions were held in which teachers were encouraged to examine their bourgeois ideas. Students were encouraged to criticize backward thinking of teachers. During school holidays teachers were required to attend special political classes. “Revolutionary universities” were established for the sole purpose of intense re-education of the educators. Teachers were also sent out into the villages to learn from the masses and to propagate proletarian ideology.(2)

Much of this campaign of ideological remolding was in name aimed at the “love America” ideology rampant among Chinese educators.

But … Well, here’s a representative example of the political line of the CCP in this campaign. This is from one professor’s self criticism.

Because of my worship-America and pro-America ideology, I forfeited my national stand during the anti-Japanese war and fell into the embrace of American imperialism. … When I spent my first four years in the United States, I was able to see only the superficial things, like the skyscrapers, the motorcars, and the shamelessly dissolute and free-spending life of the exploiting class, but not the tragic oppression of the toiling people by the monopolistic capitalists. I did not realize that the exploiting class had to squeeze the broad masses of the American people and to steal their fruits of toil before they could afford to live a free-spending life.(3)

This self criticism echoes the complaint of the Deputy Minister that we reviewed in Part 5b, that Chinese teachers “do not see the poverty of the American working people.” Here’s yet another educator who overlooked the amerikan proletariat. Who was right there in amerikkka for four entire years and still somehow missed that overwhelming majority of impoverished “American working people.” Who somehow in all those years just hadn’t come across the “tragic oppression” of those “broad masses” of “toiling people.”

The political line of the Chinese Communist Party in the educational rectification campaign (as in all other spheres) was just this: against imperialism and imperialists, for the general populaces of the imperialist nations, because those general populations were exploited “toiling people.”

This political line entailed the assumption that hundreds of thousands of Amerikan and European trained Chinese educators had each one just had a bit of bad luck in not encountering a first world proletariat in all their travels and studies. That was surely an odd coincidence of oversight, but it could be rectified by educating them (and the Chinese masses generally) as to what they had so curiously missed. So they were told by the CCP that an amerikan proletariat exists. They were told that “the exploiting class had to squeeze the broad masses of the American people and to steal their fruits of toil.”

Comrade Mao himself held this line. So, when criticizing those educators and other elements of Chinese society who spread the ideology of “love-America,” Comrade Mao himself formulated the accusation like this:

They are the very people who have illusions about the United States. They are unwilling to draw a distinction between the U.S. imperialists, who are in power, and the American people, who are not …(4)

The distinction demanded by the CCP line on the first world was in fact the demand for a trumped up class analysis that indicted the imperialists as exploiters but exonerated the first world labor aristocracy as exploited.

Here, of course, Comrade Mao is criticizing the line that exonerates the imperialists by not distinguishing them from their “good”, “exploited” populaces. Tragically, by explicitly letting the first world labor aristocracy off the hook, Comrade Mao’s and the CCP’s line implicitly lets imperialism itself off the hook. If the vast wealth of the first world aristocracy is denied, then the source of this wealth – the extent of imperialist super-profit extraction from the Third World – must perforce be denied.

And that vast first world labor aristocracy wealth was denied by the CCP, which just flat lied to the Chinese people in claiming that amerikkkans and other first worlders were “laboring masses” and “great” people.

As Maoists-Third Worldists we cannot shirk our duty to the international proletariat by calling this trumped up class analysis anything other than a flat-out lie on the part of the CCP. We cannot pretend the CCP was somehow unaware that first worlders were among the world’s richest people. Whole generations of China’s elites, responsible for imparting information about the world to the young, had known and preached about the rich “American way of life.” Hell, we’ve already seen that Peng Zhen, mayor of Beijing and Secretariat of the CCP Central Committee, made widespread Chinese knowledge of first world labor aristocracy wealth the very basis of his own nefarious push for capitalist restoration.

In the context of such widespread knowledge of first worlder wealth, the CCP’s false claims about “laboring masses” could only serve as a stamp of approval for imperialist parasitism, a wink and a nod at first world labor aristocracy exploitation of the Third World. The CCP’s fabricated first world class analysis opened wide the door to a bogus “acceptable” explanation of first worlder wealth, the theory of the productive forces.

We are not at this point prepared to claim that the CCP’s promotion of first world labor aristocracy ideology was the most powerful force paving the road to capitalist restoration in China. We’ve already acknowledged the ongoing presence of other reactionary ideologies in China against which the genuine Maoists of the time were forced to contend. At the same time, we question whether even feudalism, bureaucrat capitalism, and Confucianism combined could begin to offer the illusory payoff of material riches (in exchange for forgetting class struggle) held out by the bloody hand of the international theory of the productive forces as powered by the first world labor aristocracy.

To be sure, we are only in the infant stage of investigating and analyzing the role of the pernicious ideology of the international TOPF to the defeat of socialism in the People’s Republic. That we are only now initiating such critical studies is itself a testament to the victory of this imperialist ideology over the ICM throughout the last century.

But the international proletariat is done with the deadly revisionism that waves the red flag with one hand and the reactionary flag of the first world labor aristocracy with the other. It is past time to name names and call out the bullshit.

The Chinese Communist Party claimed they could build socialism while embracing the international theory of the productive forces as powered by the first world labor aristocracy. Maoism-Third Worldism calls that out right here and now as bullshit.

Today even Third World forces professing People’s War claim they can achieve proletarian victory without an all out fight against the first wordlist ideology that was instrumental in defeating socialism in China. In Part 6, Maoism-Third Worldism calls out those bullshitters as well.

(1) The “Hate America” Campaign in Communist China (Washington, D.C: Office of Intelligence Research of the United States Department of State, 1952) cited in Stuart Fraser (Ed) Chinese Communist Education: Records of the First Decade (Nashville, 1965), p.140.

(2) Hsia, Adrain. The Chinese Cultural Revolution (New York, 1972), pp. 78-80.

(3) Chou P’ei-yuan, ‘Criticizing My Decadent Bourgeois Ideology’ in Stuart Fraser (Ed) Chinese Communist Education: Records of the First Decade (Nashville, 1965), p.142.

(4) Mao Tse-tung, ‘Cast Away Illusions, Prepare for Struggle’ in Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung (Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1969), vol. IV, p. 428.

In 1964, Chinese newspapers reported that … in major cities like Shanghai and Peking, and even in distant provinces such as Shensi and Shansi, numerous young people were going about with long hair, pointed shoes and tight trousers. … Other aspects of western culture also found favour with a section of Chinese youth at that time. … These young people had become ‘degenerate, disaffected’ and politically unreliable.

By and large, the children of former capitalists did not follow the western fashion; they were always suspect, and so could not afford to expose themselves in this way. And, in fact, it was the young people with socially acceptable class affiliations – above all, the sons and daughters of senior functionaries - who flaunted their bourgeois and western tastes. (1) 

We’re still examining the possible contribution of the international (first world labor aristocracy) theory of the productive forces to the defeat of socialism in China. In Part 4 the guts of this bourgeois ideology was shown to be the bogus promise: forget class struggle and you’ll get to live like amerikkkans, like the richest people on earth. Then in Part 5 we spotlighted the mayor of Beijing, Peng Zhen, as pushing a revisionist, capitalist restorationist line which was in fact dependent upon the international TOPF for its efficacy. We said there that Peng’s line indicated some significant buying into this fallacy of first worldism amongst the Chinese masses – otherwise international TOPF-based lines such as Peng’s would have no hope of gaining traction.

That analysis was all quite reasonable but its end assertion – that the ideology of first worldism was probably widespread amongst the Chinese masses – was still mainly a product of logical conclusion rather than factual examination. The italicized article above, however, appears to provide concrete historical evidence of that same conclusion, at least within a particular section of the Chinese people. The “degenerate, disaffect” youth depicted in the Chinese news reports were not aping the reactionary culture of Chinese feudal lords or even that of Chinese capitalists. They were emulating “ordinary” first world labor aristocrats, “ordinary” rich amerikkkans. So yes, those 1964 reports do appear to be some confirming evidence that to some significant degree first world labor aristocrat thinking was prevalent in China.

But perhaps this love-amerikkka ideology was anomalous in China, a brief flirtation with the international TOPF confined to this particular section of the people.

Not so. Take a look at just one extremely influential sector of Chinese society, education. This is then Vice-Minister of Education, Tseng Chao-lun:

For the past hundred years, American imperialism has not only been carrying out the most blatant sort of military, political, and economic aggression, but, what is far more pernicious, it has always employed a small part of the spoils derived from the Chinese people for the establishment of missionary schools … in an attempt to achieve the spiritual enslavement of Chinese children and youths through the dissemination of poisonous pro-America, revere-America, and fear-America sentiments. (2)

Complementing the cultural aggression of the amerikan-sponsored schools within China was the bourgeois schooling of Chinese educators in the first world itself.

In 1922 China adopted the American system of education. From then onwards her university teachers received a “bourgeois” education, either in China or – in the majority of cases – in the USA or Europe. These university teachers then trained the secondary and primary school teachers. As a result, nearly all Chinese educationalists came to acquire a “bourgeois” mentality: they admired the “bourgeois” culture of America and Europe for its economic, technological and scientific advancements, and its political freedom. (3)

At the time of liberation, then, the Chinese educational corps was in fact awash in love-amerika ideology. And so much so that two years after liberation the Deputy Minister of Education, reporting on the “pro-America, worship-America, fear-America mentality” of Chinese teachers, would state frankly that

… not a small number of teachers in higher educational institutions are still preserving strong European-American reactionary capitalist-class thoughts, especially a tendency to worship the American Capitalist class. Even now they still stubbornly worship the mode of living of the Anglo-American capitalist class, especially the so-called “American way of life.” They admire American wealth (they do not see the poverty of the American working people) … (4)

Let’s remove the parentheses from that last statement: They admire American wealth – they do not see the poverty of the American working people. Of course not. The “American way of life” so worshiped by China’s educators was not that of the amerikkkan super-rich and the yacht club set but that of “average” amerikan “workers,” the majority of whom, we’ll continue to point out, were among the world’s richest people – there was no poverty to be seen. It’s absolutely critical to understand this about China’s educational corps. Their own “education” in the first world had not taught them a longing to be big capitalists squeezing the lifeblood from their “own” first world populations of subsistence-living proletarians. They learned “only” the longing to live like the “regular folks” of those first world populations – that was the “American wealth” and “American way of life” of their ideological aspirations. The Chinese educational corps, across the board, had acquired, and were intent on disseminating, nothing more or less than first world labor aristocracy ideology. They were thoroughly infected with the lie of the international theory of the productive forces.

So, far from being anomalous, those “degenerate, disaffected” Chinese youth in 1964 were symptomatic of a much more widespread first world labor aristocracy cancer in Chinese society, extending at the time of liberation at least throughout the nation’s educational ranks.

To be sure, the first worldism prevalent in China was not the only reactionary ideology inherited by the People’s Republic from the old society. Feudalism had prevailed for thousands of years. China’s bureaucrat capitalism had been around for a hundred years. But, we will argue in Part 5c, the ideology of the first world labor aristocracy was a viciously powerful reactionary vehicle for accomplishing the restoration of capitalism in China, and it was an ideology that the Chinese communists not only failed to combat, but in fact promoted.

(1) Hsia, Adrain. The Chinese Cultural Revolution (New York), p.69.

(2) Tseng Chaolun, ‘The Disposal of American-Subsidized Schools is the First Task on the Cultural Front Now’ in Stuart Fraser (Ed) Chinese Communist Education: Records of the First Decade (Nashville, 1965), p.98.

(3) Hsia, p.38.

(4) Chien Chun-jui, ‘The Key to Reform of Higher Education’ in Stuart Fraser (Ed) Chinese Communist Education: Records of the First Decade (Nashville, 1965), p.123.